Sunday, March 26, 2006

I WANT A CFIDS/HIV REVOLUTION (AND I WANT IT NOW)!

Why are Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) -- the same exact disorder -- named two different things in the most powerful nations in the world (United States, United Kingdom, and Australia)?

Why are CFS and ME so prevalent in these three allied countries?

Why is ME mindfully categorized as a psychiatric disorder, in the United Kingdom, even though there is objective evidence (and millions of immunodeficient patients) that contradicts otherwise?

Why does ME have a barely pronounceable naming convention? In the USA, why does the medical establishment label the CFS disease paradigm with such a belittling name, which hardly portrays the severity of the illness? And, why do you only get a CFS diagnosis when you are barely hanging on by a thread?

Why does idiopathic CD4 lymphocytopenia (ICL/HIV-Negative AIDS) -- the most advanced stage of CFS -- have such a tongue-twister of a name as well?

Why are Gulf War Illnesses/Syndromes (GWI/S) commingled in the same, we-are-going-to-neglect-you-and-could-not-care-any-less-about-you, bucket as CFS/ME patients?

Am I a GWI/S patient?

Or are they CFS/ME patients?

Why was the major media momentum on HIV-Negative AIDS (idiopathic CD4 lymphocytopenia) abruptly halted at the 1992 International AIDS conference, one year after the Persian Gulf War I?


"As you are no doubt aware, NIAID head Anthony Fauci quelled the only important public debate that ever sprang up around this anomoly, in 1992, when doctors at an AIDS conference in Amsterdam started revealing that they had scores of HIV-negative "AIDS" cases. Fauci flew in to the conference from the U.S. on Air Force Two and held a press conference that swiftly hammered any rising curiosity right out of the press body, by informing them that these cases had nothing to do with AIDS and were their own disease (ICL). He added that focusing attention on this was irresponsible. Heads nodded and notepads whooshed, as pages were filled with the new doctrine. Before you could shake a stick at any of it, the CDC had renamed all HIV-negative cases "ICL,"...
(Celia Farber, NYPress, Volume 18, Issue 2, The Mail)


Do I have CFS/ICL?
Or do I have ICL/AIDS?

Statistically speaking, I know that my idiopathic illness is not rare, so why are there no research programs in the USA aimed at determining the cause of CFS and/or idiopathic lymphocytopenia (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/)? Why, when you search the internet for my idiopathic illness, am I one of the top 10 resources that comes up -- even present-day medical journal citations are hard to find? Why do I (i.e., my blood) have to go keep going out of the USA to pursue a systemic diagnosis?

Does anybody actually believe that they can find a cure for an illness, without first understanding its cause? Why was NIH/CDC funding, apportioned to CFS research, throughout the 1990's mysteriously misrouted? And, why do so many CFS/ME patients test positive for the bacteria, Borreliosis (a.k.a. Lyme), even though there has been no exposure to, or risk for, ticks?

Why are US-based scientists, who question the HIV paradigm, banished to other countries to pursue their research studies (e.g., Dr. Peter Duesberg Ph.D.), finding that all their government-sponsored funding has vanished (e.g., Dr. W. John Martin M.D. Ph.D.)? Why isn't my government (i.e., those who purportedly work for me, not vice versa) more supportive of, and intrigued by, research for millions of its ailing/dying, CFS-diagnosed citizens? Do you think it's possible that my government already knows exactly what is causing CFS/ME, which would explain why it needn't conduct any more research, so rather than spending their time trying to fix the problem they choose to spend their time (i.e., my tax money) trying to mask the truth by creating a facade built of smoke-and-mirrors?

Why do CFS/ME patients allow themselves to be oppressed and muted? We are the ones with the (a)cquired (i)mmune (d)eficiency (s)yndromes. We are the A.I.D.S. patients and all of our research funding goes towards fueling a, clearly bogus, HIV paradigm -- which falsely stigmatizes, demoralizes and, in some cases, criminalizes very healthy HIV+ individuals, who are being brainwashed into drugging themselves to death.

Why aren't more people outraged?

I WANT A CFIDS/HIV REVOLUTION
(AND I WANT IT NOW)!
I AM NOT AFRAID OF THE TRUTH.
I AM A HIV-NEGATIVE AIDS/CFS PATIENT.
I AM A HUMANITARIAN, AND
I DEMAND A REAPPRAISAL OF AIDS!


MY RE-APPRAISAL OF AIDS --> CLICK HERE 

PLEASE WRITE TO YOUR EMPLOYEES AND TELL THEM WHERE YOU WANT
YOUR TAX MONEY TO BE SPENT:
http://whitehouse.gov/contact/