Monday, February 20, 2006

"Harpers astonishes the world with the extent of AIDS skulduggery"

"Anthony Fauci will probably spill his coffee when he read "Out of Control", everyman's guide to the HIV?AIDS scam.  Duesberg gets his due as the whistleblower of the Enron of science."

{Source: http://scienceguardian.com/blog/harpers-astonishes-the-world-with-the-extent-of-aids-skulduggery.htm }

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

But, if HIV is not the cause of AIDS, then, what is?? 

Because HIV-Negative AIDS patients are not prescribed any toxic Anti-RetroViral meds (ARV's).

Nobody even acknowledges our idiopathic illnesses, never mind to care enough to want to drug us.

I believe that to systemically diagnosis millions of ailing, med-free, immunosuppressed CFS patients -- will be to answer the next-most, sequentially-logical question --> What is the cause of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS)?


Orthodoxy: HIV/AIDS

AIDS Myth: HIV?AIDS

My Proposal: CFS->AIDS


Please write your representatives demanding a REAPPRAISING OF AIDS and funding for research on HIV-NEGATIVE AIDS cases.

U.S. Reps here:

http://senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
http://house.gov/representatives/
http://whitehouse.gov/contact/

DEAR CONGRESSMAN" SAMPLE LETTER -->

http://cfsstraighttalk.blogspot.com/2006/10/potential-hope-for-cfidsme-patients.html

BACK TO HOME PAGE --> CLICK HERE 

Sunday, February 12, 2006

REAPPRAISING AIDS: NATURE VS. INTELLIGENCE?

In 3rd world countries (e.g., in Africa), where HIV diagnostic tests do not exist and/or are too expensive to conduct "Chronic Fatigue Syndrome" (CFS) patients are diagnosed "AIDS" by symptoms alone. Testing HIV+ is not even a prerequisite of an "AIDS" diagnosis in most of these countries.*    www.houseofnumbers.com

* "There are currently at least eleven different criteria for how many and what proteins at which band density signal “positive.” The most stringent criteria (four bands) are upheld in Australia and France; the least stringent (two bands), IN AFRICA, WHERE AN HIV TEST IS NOT EVEN REQUIRED AS PART OF AN AIDS DIAGNOSIS. The U.S. standard is three reactive bands. It has been pointed out that a person could revert to being HIV negative simply by buying a plane ticket from Uganda to Australia." www.harpers.org/archive/2006/03/0080961


"OBAMA LIFTS HIV IMMIGRATION BAN"  www.cis.org/feere/hivban


BBC-NEWS: NHS staff: HIV ban lifted www.bbc.com/news/health-23698991


"HIV is Harmless" --> http://lewrockwell.com/2014/05/donald-w-miller-jr-md/hiv-is-harmless 

"More Scientists Question HIV" -->  http://www.dailycal.org/2012/02/22/uc-berkeley-professor-denies-link-between-hiv-and-aids/ 

"UC Berkeley Prof Denies HIV AIDS" -->  http://www.dailycal.org/2012/02/22/uc-berkeley-professor-denies-link-between-hiv-and-aids


Best Explained --> HIV is an innocent passenger in a hi-jacked car. You cannot deny its presence, but HIV wasn't "the cause" of the crime. The reason why most HIV+ people remain perfectly healthy, for decades, is because HIV requires a *co-factor* to accelerate. These co-factors of AIDS are the very same undiagnosed causes of CFS.

* How come no one who is HIV+ has CFS (or Lyme)? 

* How is it all those *high risk* populations do not have what CFSers' have in their *low risk* bodies? 

The answer is --> THEY DO!     

AIDS = HIV + CFS

Perfectly healthy HIV+ people do not become symptomatic (and/or progress to AIDS), until an undiagnosed CFS-defining hijacker enters their system.  It's clear to me that AIDS patients are just more CFS patients, who harbor a questionably harmless virus, HIV.

In other words, AIDS patients are simply
the undiagnosed CFS patients of the
otherwise perfectly healthy HIV+ population.
==========================================================
★★AWARD-WINNING DOCUMENTARY

"HOUSE OF NUMBERS: HIV/AIDS STORY IS BEING REWRITTEN"

3-minute movie trailer --> http://houseofnumbers.com
90 minute movie --> www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwgmzbnckII
==========================================================
Over the past two years, I've read a ton of medical literature. HIV Negative AIDS cases (i.e., Idiopathic CD4 Lymphocytopenia, ICL) percolate through many HIV/AIDS documents.  I first stumbled across them in Johns Hopkins' "2003 Medical Management of HIV Infection" guide (J. Barlett, J. Gallant - Chapter 2, Page 21) (http://hopkins-aids.edu/publications/book/03MMHIV1to3.pdf).  I have the hardcopy. I later found citations on CNN and CSPAN (dating back to 1992, the Gulf War):  https://www.c-span.org/video/?31375-1/icl-blood-supply.

Interestingly enough, ICL cases also weave through the CFS literature --> http://ncf-net.org/forum/presidentsMsg0402.html.

"Non HIV AIDS Now Confirmed in Asia: Watch CNN Video"

HIV-NEGATIVE AIDS cases are the bridge
that connect the CFS & AIDS paradigms. 

I'd rather stand alone, as a non-conformist with a fresh ideology, than follow misguided frauds herding us in the wrong direction.

MY "RE-APPRAISAL OF AIDS."


Posted by Picasa {click to enlarge}


My NON HIV AIDS case goes up through the CDC, NIH, White House, WHO, to the UN. 
I testified federally in Washington, DC and am published 35 times on 4 continents.

MY FEDERAL TESTIMONY --> NON HIV AIDS 
Washington, DC via conference call
5-minutes (starts @ Minute-0):
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubjGm5dILpY&list=PL600CB038194B4593&index=11&feature=plpp_video/

MY 8 STEP PLAN
TO RESOLVE OUR WORLD'S CATASTROPHIC
PUBLIC HEALTH DISASTER -->
CLICK HERE 

IS LYME THE NEXT AIDS? 

http://wholehealthinsider.com/newsletter/lyme-next-aids/ 

http://truth-out.org/news/item/21206-from-aids-to-lyme-will-we-let-history-repeat-itself


"NEWEST STD: LYME DISEASE"

http://mensfitness.com/women/sex-tips/newest-std-lyme-disease and
http://treatlyme.net/treat-lyme-book/can-lyme-be-sexually-transmitted-yes.html

 ================================================================
BACK TO HOME PAGE --> CLICK HERE 

Wednesday, February 01, 2006

WHO ARE THE AIDS DISSIDENTS?

There exists a once-progressive movement of non-conformists who question HIV=AIDS paradigm. Simply put, they are "AIDS Dissidents."

AIDS dissidents claim that HIV is not the cause of AIDS. They claim that there is no stitch of scientific evidence proving that HIV causes AIDS. They claim that AIDS is a falsity, and pronouce that HIV, like all retroviruses, is harmless.

Dissidents claim that the HIV diagnostic tests are as flimsy as the orthodox paradigm for which it stands, requiring dilution and confirmatory tests, while creating both false-positives and -negatives. Dissidents claim that "HIV/AIDS" is a fraud, manufactured solely to benefit the Rx companies, who get rich pumping toxic medications into patients who do not know better to question them, then those very same carcinogenic drugs --> kill.

AIDS dissidents claim to want a "REAPPRAISAL OF AIDS," but these purported *thinkers,* and er, "questioners," then stipulate no other pathogens that cause immune dysfunction, cancer, or death.

AIDS DISSIDENTS ARE A BUNCH
OF HYPOCRITES!

Lets' review -->

...claims to be 'rethinking' and 'questioning' when they are not at all.  They stopped purportedly 'thinking' when they settled on their own stale, half-baked, toxicity beliefs.

HYPOCRITE: repeatedly censor facts about infectious NON HIV AIDS cases, deleting  research links, books, and citations off their forums (or burying citations in "off topic" categories) just like the orthodox community, moderating posts in 1984-style (i.e., with no respect for the U.S. Constitution or our veterans, just like Big Brother), all while harassing me in the same evil, evil manner that the orthodox community treated Christine Maggiore (who, might I add, is one of my heroes, http://aliveandwell.org/).  Repeat: QA/RA does to me, exactly, what the orthodox community did to Christine.

CONCLUSION -->  
HYPOCRITE = AIDS DISSIDENT

I have NON HIV AIDS.  So, I believe that it is 100% appropriate for me to question whether HIV is the cause of AIDS. One totally insane QA/RA group has been clear that they want no part of an NON HIV AIDS patient in their community (e.g., "You are a distraction to the RA mission.  We have a PV (i.e., point of view) to uphold.  So, F*CK YOU. F-CK OFF. F*CK YOU."). 

Okie dokie then.  Their genocidal idiocy is flippin' mindboggling: Er, what exactly is the mission of "Rethinking AIDS," if not to rethink AIDS??  Legitimate "thinkers" should not have a POV.

Why wouldn't dissidents be embracing NON HIV AIDS cases?

Why wouldn't dissidents be leveraging tens of miiillllliiiiiiooooonnnsss of NON HIV AIDS cases to argue their viewpoint? Hello?

NON HIV AIDS cases (like mine) are the whole foundation for their very existence.  These forums filled with ignorants would not exist without cases like me --> NON HIV AIDS defies Koch's 1st postulate.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch's_postulates

It's doubtful these QA/RAers' have ever even cracked a book open....

Dr. Peter Duesberg discusses "HIV free AIDS" in his 1996 book "Inventing the AIDS Virus," read here (Pages 385-6) --> http://books.google.com/books?id=pRWVZJKO0NsC&pg=PA386&lpg=PA386&dq=duesberg,+ICL,+fauci&source=bl&ots=0nnBUbN5DV&sig=iTGyFmIhCBqNHXo9R4WuRDDwoGM&hl=en&sa=X&ei=WJSuT5bxLKH06AH9zLSSCQ&sqi=2&ved=0CE0Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=duesberg%2C%20ICL%2C%20fauci&f=false 
as does Robert Root-Bernstein in his 1993 book Rethinking AIDS: The Tragic Cost of Premature Consensus --> http://amazon.com/Rethinking-Aids-Tragic-Premature-Consensus/dp/B000N3DSJY/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1404046181&sr=8-1&keywords=root+bernstein+premature+aids

Why wouldn't a platform, which claims to offer the most "comprehensive, detailed analyses of every aspect of so-called "HIV" and "AIDS," be analyzing the parallels between AIDS & CFS?

I especially laugh-out-loud when these folks dole-out unsolicited advice on how to start a revolution, as if they have any flippin' clue.  QA/RA platforms have made no progress in 30 years, none. zero. zilch. They tell me that they're the "longest-running" groups --> yes, that means you've killed the most people.  They are a roadblock, setting humanity back, and should just stop talking. 

It's disturbingly comical when admins' try to lecture me -- as if I'd read advice from a bunch of nonsense.  I don't lack for mainstream respect ---- something these unprogressive folks have never, in 3 decades, obtained.  Dissidents, rather comically, really believe that posting on their hideous, repulsive, genocidal forums (which most of the mainstream and world simply just ignores as the utter nonsense, that it is) is a "privilege."

"Never argue with a fool -
they'll drag you down to their level,
then beat you with experience."

It gets better.... their "logic" is that I post too much of the same topic (i.e., NON HIV AIDS) ---- as if that's negative quality of mine.  Ha!  Repetition and constant messaging is exactly what they lack.  They cannot even begin to comprehend that if NON HIV AIDS were the only topic posted on their forums, people might actually start respecting them -- maybe even me.

These "questioners" have no flippin' clue, what they are talking about.  What's really disturbing is these ignorants, even when you tell them flat-out that they are killing people with their theories, simply just don't care that they are killing people.  Then, carry-on with their murderous drivel.

I think where most AIDS dissidents miss-the-boat is that they're so busy saying "HIV is not the cause of AIDS" pointing to drug toxicity, benzene, lifestyles, water supply, oxidative stress, etc. that they fail to see that other stealth pathogens (e.g., the result of a faulty HHV6, SCMV, SV40 or Lyme assays) are clearly causing immune dysfunction, cancer, and death.  Certainly, lifestyle, eating habits, and genetic predisposition are all secondary factors that can expedite one's physical demise, but acquiring a nasty microbe can definitely be the precipitating event.

Listen @ Minute 1:25 --> "Peter is highly intelligent, but he is killing people with his theories"  --> http://houseofnumbers.com

CONCLUSION: 

HYPOCRITE = AIDS DISSIDENT

I think where most AIDS dissidents continue to miss-the-mark is that they are so busy saying "HIV is not the cause of AIDS" that they fail to see that there is a BLAZING heterosexual CFS epidemic sweeping across the developed world. (http://cfsstraighttalk.blogspot.com/2005/12/do-i-have-aids-or-chronic-fatigue.html).

AIDS patients are just more CFS patients, who only by pure coincidence are HIV+.

If QA/RAers' cannot see that there is something seriously wrong going on with both AIDS and CFS research by looking at a NON HIV AIDS (e.g., me) then they are clearly living a life of denial. If they cannot see that there is something seriously wrong going on with both AIDS and CFS research by looking at one NON HIV AIDS case that can be epidemiologically-linked --- then they're living in a hypocritical QA/RA world-of-delusion.

I really wish that more closed-minded hypocritical dissidents would use my NON HIV AIDS case to expand their minds.

Dissidents need to get up-to-speed on the CFS pandemic.  I suggest reading Hillary Johnson's book, Osler's Web, as a start:(http://amazon.com/gp/product/051770353X/sr=8-1/qid=1139498368/ref=sr_1_1/104-0661546-9436744?%5Fencoding=UTF8). Chapter 33 is entitled "HIV Negative AIDS." 

Then when asked: What's the cause of AIDS? After denouncing HIV's involvement, all any dissident would have to say is: Why not ask the CFS establishment?  They are the one's with millions of ailing immunosuppressed patients.

A RETHINKER or QUESTIONER should open-minded to wherever the facts may lead.  I am living proof that one person can change the world. Imagine what a 100 of us could do. Or, 1,000 of us. Or 1,000,000 of us, working together, could accomplish for the betterment of humanity. The possibilities alone boggle my mind...

My quest has always been to unravel the truth, with an open mind (no stipulations attached!).

I WISH THAT THE QA/RA DISSIDENTS WOULD 
GET OUT OF MY FLIPPIN' WAY! 
WITH THEIR ADDED HYPOCRITY,
THEY'RE 1 BILLION TIMES WORSE THAN THE ORTHODOX COMMUNITY! 

I'D TELL THEM TOO.... BUT I GOT CENSORED OFF ALL THEIR SITES --> 
BUNCH OF FLIPPIN' HYPOCRITES!

WELCOME TO 1984. --> C'EST LA VIE.

MY RE-APPRAISAL OF AIDS: --> CLICK HERE

My NON HIV AIDS case goes up through the NIH, CDC, White House, WHO, to the UN.  I testified federally in Washington-DC, and am published 28 times on 4 continents.

MY FEDERAL TESTIMONY 
Washington, DC via conference ~  5-minutes (starts @ Minute-0):

BACK TO HOME PAGE --> CLICK HERE